NoSQL Database Comparison 2026: MongoDB vs Cassandra vs DynamoDB vs Couchbase

Choosing the right NoSQL database is critical for scalability and performance. MongoDB, Cassandra, DynamoDB, and Couchbase each solve different problems. This comprehensive guide compares these four leading NoSQL solutions across architecture, scaling, consistency, and cost.

Quick Comparison

MongoDB: The Document Database

What Is MongoDB?

MongoDB is a document-oriented NoSQL database that stores data as JSON-like documents. Its the most popular NoSQL database for general-purpose applications.

Advantages

• Familiar data model: JSON documents match application objects
• Flexible schema: Add fields without migration
• Rich queries: Complex queries similar to SQL
• Transactions: ACID multi-document transactions (v4.0+)
• Indexes: Multiple index types (B-tree, geospatial, text)
• Aggregation framework: Powerful data processing pipeline
• Large community: Most popular NoSQL database
• MongoDB Atlas: Managed cloud hosting available

Disadvantages

• Memory overhead: 2-3x higher memory usage than Cassandra
• Limited horizontal scaling: Sharding is complex and has issues
• Commercial license: Self-hosted requires SSPL licensing
• Not true distributed: Master-slave replication (not true peer-to-peer)
• Write locking: Can cause contention under heavy write loads

Best For

Traditional applications, rapid prototyping, applications with flexible schema, scenarios with complex queries, teams familiar with SQL/JavaScript.

Cost Estimate (100 GB)

• MongoDB Atlas (managed): $50-500/month depending on tier
• Self-hosted: $300-1,000/month infrastructure

—

Cassandra: The Distributed Powerhouse

What Is Cassandra?

Cassandra is a wide-column store designed for massive scale. Developed at Facebook, it powers some of the worlds largest deployments with trillions of records.

Advantages

• Extreme scale: Proven to handle petabytes of data
• True distributed: Peer-to-peer architecture (no single point of failure)
• High availability: No master node (all nodes equal)
• Linear scaling: Add nodes, get predictable performance improvement
• Write optimized: Exceptional write throughput (100,000+ writes/sec per node)
• Open source: Apache 2.0 license (completely free)
• Tunable consistency: Choose consistency level per query
• Multi-datacenter: Built-in replication across datacenters

Disadvantages

• Complex queries: Limited query flexibility (not like SQL)
• Eventual consistency: Strong consistency has tradeoffs
• Learning curve: Distributed systems concepts required
• Schema design critical: Query patterns must drive schema (reverse of SQL)
• Operational complexity: Requires experienced operations team
• Debugging difficult: Distributed system issues hard to troubleshoot

Best For

Time-series data, massive scale (petabytes), write-heavy workloads, high-availability requirements, multi-datacenter deployments, IoT and sensor data.

Cost Estimate (100 GB)

• Self-hosted: $500-2,000/month infrastructure + DevOps
• Managed (Astra): $25-500/month

—

DynamoDB: The AWS Native Solution

What Is DynamoDB?

DynamoDB is Amazons fully managed NoSQL database service. It handles infrastructure completely, offering seamless scaling and high availability.

Advantages

• Fully managed: Zero operational overhead
• Seamless scaling: Scales automatically (on-demand pricing)
• High availability: Replicates across availability zones
• AWS integration: Seamless with Lambda, S3, CloudWatch, etc.
• Fast: Single-digit millisecond latency
• Simple pricing: Pay for capacity you use
• Global tables: Multi-region replication built-in
• Strong consistency: Optional ACID transactions

Disadvantages

• Limited queries: Only query by primary key or GSI (no complex filtering)
• Query language limited: Simple key-value operations
• AWS lock-in: Only on AWS (not portable)
• Expensive at scale: Can become very expensive (million+ dollar bills possible)
• Learning curve: AWS-specific concepts (partition keys, sort keys, GSI)
• Difficult schema changes: Modifying capacity requires downtime

Best For

AWS-native applications, startups wanting zero ops, real-time applications, mobile backends, serverless architectures, applications with unpredictable traffic.

Cost Estimate (100 GB)

• On-demand pricing: $0.00013 per read unit + storage
• Realistic estimate: $100-500/month (depends heavily on traffic)
• Risk: Can be $10,000+/month if queried inefficiently

—

Couchbase: The Hybrid Approach

What Is Couchbase?

Couchbase is a hybrid database combining document store (like MongoDB) with key-value performance (like Cassandra). It offers ACID transactions and rich querying.

Advantages

• Document + KV: Flexibility of documents with KV performance
• ACID transactions: Multi-document transactions supported
• N1QL: SQL-like query language for JSON data
• Caching built-in: Integrated caching layer
• High availability: Automatic failover and replication
• Flexible deployment: Self-hosted or managed cloud
• Cross-datacenter: XDCR (cross-datacenter replication)

Disadvantages

• Commercial license: Expensive for enterprise
• Smaller community: Fewer resources than MongoDB
• Operational complexity: Complex cluster management
• Learning curve: Steep for beginners
• Memory requirements: Requires significant RAM

Best For

Applications needing both document flexibility and KV performance, organizations wanting SQL-like queries on JSON, real-time applications, high-availability requirements.

Cost Estimate (100 GB)

• Couchbase Cloud (managed): $100-1,000/month
• Self-hosted: $500-2,000/month infrastructure

—

Use Case Comparison

—

Performance Benchmarks

Write Throughput (per node)

• Cassandra: 100,000+ writes/sec (best for writes)
• DynamoDB: 10,000+ writes/sec (provisioned capacity)
• MongoDB: 5,000-10,000 writes/sec
• Couchbase: 10,000+ writes/sec

Query Latency

• DynamoDB: <1 ms (fastest)
• Couchbase: 1-2 ms
• Cassandra: 1-5 ms
• MongoDB: 5-10 ms

Horizontal Scalability

• Cassandra: Linear (add node = proportional performance)
• DynamoDB: Unlimited (AWS managed)
• MongoDB: Sublinear (sharding overhead)
• Couchbase: Linear (good scaling)

—

Final Recommendation for 2026

• Most startups/teams: MongoDB or DynamoDB (easiest to learn and use)
• Extreme scale required: Cassandra (proven at petabyte scale)
• AWS-only shops: DynamoDB (native integration)
• Hybrid needs: Couchbase (documents + performance)
• Open-source preference: Cassandra (Apache 2.0)

Decision matrix:

• If you need complex queries: MongoDB or Couchbase
• If you need extreme scale: Cassandra
• If you want zero ops: DynamoDB
• If you want open-source: Cassandra
• If youre unsure: MongoDB (safest choice)